Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

After the producers blog called what happened to Marcel a "compelling story," I don't trust anything they say because they do not think like normal people.

---

You're a strange person Amazon. Lot's of stories that are not particularly pleasant are "compelling". Jesus built a 2,000 year career on one.

---

Didn't you know, Sooner? It's all fair game when you're bucking for the "Magdalene Of The Year" award. I think Marcel's got that one in the bag, but I guess you can't blame someone for trying.

---

I thought it was in very poor taste for a producer of TC to call the assault on Marcel "a compelling story." It occurred under their watch, for pete's sake, recorded with a camera they gave to the Assault Brigade.

I think it shows a kind of disconnect from the reality most normal people would experience if they were in the producers' shoes at this point.

---

If you're so dissatisfied with the majority of the contestants (aka the "Assault Brigade," which is just a new name for the "Bully-Gang") as well as the production staff now, just "disconnect" altogether and stop watching the show.

---

Ok hold your horses there cheffy, your makign far too much sense for a person suffering from just an average case of dementia, let alone one whos paranoid delusions are this bad. You got a better chance of convinceing Ed Beagly Jr. to do Hummer commercials than you do of getting this disgraceful wack job to leave.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"Plus I didn't call anyone a butthead...that would be ROOD....lol"


Everytime I see Rood, it cracks me up.

brillke

---

It reminds me of full house episodes. lol

You go Bob Saget!

---

Jinx!!!

---

LOL.
I don't remember that one.... Care to refresh my memorex??

I don't know why but it cracked me up too....lol

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Youd think we could agree to disagree, wouldnt ya? Go back and look at who is doing the most bashing. It aint the non Marcel fans doing the most, I assure you. Amazon has made it an art form to bash, even if she is dead wrong and proven to be so, yet continue on as if she is that God Warrior from Trading Spouses or whatever it was called.

---

It's only natural that X percent of people are going to pull for Marcel because he is most decidedly they underdog. That's completely understandable. But some of these folks cross the line of sanity into Conspiracy City.

---

People who poo-poo conspiracy theories are often the ones who benefit most from trying to deny a conspiracy exists.

Conspiracies, large and small, occur every day. When three teenage girls agree to secretly exclude one of their four-friend group from a common activity, that's a conspiracy. When a government invades another country based on lies told to the public, that's a conspiracy. It happens all the time.

To even try to denigrate "conspiracy theories" on a board about Top Chef is ridiculous. Ilan has actively conspired with others to get Marcel thrown off the show. Sam, Ilan, Elia and Cliff conspired to assault Marcel. Elia herself urged a conspiracy where they all would shave their heads and Marcel would be left with a full head of hair.

And the production staff has certainly opened itself wide to conspiracy theories.

---

Says the woman who works with plants and wears a aluminum foil helmet.

---

You know what WAJ..This will be the first and last time I ever do this...Peeps who continually argue with other peeps are just as bad as the peeps they are calling out to me...You may find this to be a verbal game of who is wittier.... smarter and more adept with the keyboard..But if you don't like Amazon.......why keep at her???

You must enjoy this somewhow so don't [expletive deleted] about it
if Amazon does it...It is getting far too nasty for me and it hurts to read this to tell you the truth....We need not hate so much no matter who started it..But I shall just
ignore and scroll on down the road and mind my own biz as I usually do cause life is just a bit too LONG to read anymore of this sh&t!!!!

And now I can understand why YOU like the Crack Pack...lol

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"Plus I didn't call anyone a butthead...that would be ROOD....lol"


Everytime I see Rood, it cracks me up.

brillke

---

It reminds me of full house episodes. lol

You go Bob Saget!

---

Jinx!!!

---

LOL.
I don't remember that one.... Care to refresh my memorex??

I don't know why but it cracked me up too....lol

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Are you for serious? LOLZ Can you imagine the dialogue??

Tom: Sam, hand back over the MF $100,000 dude

Sam: Why?

Tom: because some chick named cassie said I COULD do this. We are sending over a truck to p/u all of the kenmore appliances too.

---

And again you misrepresent me. You like doing that, or is it an accident?
At this moment, I'm choosing to believe that Tom is Honest. Given that, I know if I was talked into changing my mind on a decision due to being "Misinformed", I would do everything in my power to fix it. Yes, even if it stripped one winner over another. His name and rep are attached to the show, I'm sure he doesn't want to be remembered as someone easily dupable, or a person afraid to correct a wrong once he knows of it.


I mean seriously, If Sam "WON", he'd only be stripped of the win if the true order of events showed he should have been dq'ed before the final. If he wasn't to be dq'ed, no change in his win. Same for any of the others.

---

Uuuuuuuuuuuuuh... ooookaaay *ah coo-coo coo-coo coo-coo*

---

Are the words too big for you to understand?

Simple.

Let's assume Tom is both truthful in what he's said so far in the matter AND a standup person. The fact that SOMEONE lied to him about the sequencing, and therefore the nature of what happened to Marcel, may well indeed make a standup honest person rethink a decision and act accordingly. Notice I did not say that action would be to give the win to Marcel.


If Tom knows the real deal and is playing along with production and the story to do...well something I guess, then nothing will change.

I've never been a Marcel Fan, but I'm not a hater either. I think he should have to compete against the last 3 standing chefs that were not breaking contest rules in a way to get them DQ'ed. That would be fair, both by my understanding of the rules they agree to and by (I hope) society values that ganging up on people does not earn you a reward. That behavior would get them dq'ed from any smart kitchen in the world.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

LMAO, yeah, JMe, going to be way too much going on here..may have to hide. Part of my point was that Cassie has just as much right to her opinion, AND that her reasoning was "possible" under certain conditions. However, one person just kept being a butthead and that is NO way to make a new poster welcome. There has been a lot of biatching about new peeps getting a lot of tude from long time posters. Who will win??? Anyones guess at this point. But Cassie has made a good point as far as I'm concerned, whether I agree or not. SOOOO, I am now stepping off my soap box...LOL

---

Too right....You go giiiiirl!

Here's the thing...I think you should never call a poster an idiot for what they think even though I would love to.

It is rood!!!!!

Take issue with the content.....not the poster.

Don't we all think peeps who do not agree with us are idiots??????.....lol
But calling them an idiot is just not very nice.

BTW..Has Mr JUSTME groveled for forgiveness on the hair cutting issue yet?????

I think he needs to do some serious groveling????

Maybe even buy you a nice present....Airplane tix to Hawaii would be nice:O))))

Since we are co Miss Savants of 2007..I go too!!!!

Woooooooohooooooooo

He'll be mincemeat...lol

---

LOLZ!! Im the butthead you all are referring to. BTW, I NEVER called anyone an idiot, you just read that into it. As much as Cassie has a right to her opinion we all do. She was the one who copped tude with me first with her implying that I was stupid (saying $hit like, "are the words too big for you?) Look, I could care less that she said that, but if you guys are going to rant & rave about expressing opinions while stepping on ppls toes, then I think you ought to extend me the same courtesy & rant & rave back at her for doing the exact same thing.

This whole thing started because I said, "Lay off the weed" Now if you guys don't get that I was joking then kindly remove the stick from your arses. Again, just kidding folks!!! Why is everyone so serious around here?

---

OH NO......Ms [expletive deleted]..lol..I didn't mean you at ALL.....I agree with much of what I have seen you have posted and you have been nice as far as I can tell...I never even read that whole thread and didn't even know you posted to Cassie.If Cassie did that well then youse two fight it out.
I ain't going back 300 pages.))))
I just meant in general....Sorry if you thought I meant you.........Oy and lol!!

Plus I didn't call anyone a butthead...that would be ROOD....lol

---

First, Kristl. It was MHO, just never named her. I have gone back and reposted with my comments on her posted reply to Cassie. I am sure she has been a friendly poster, just felt she was very rood to Cassie. JMHO and I do stick up for peeps when necessary

On a lighter note..My Aunt replied and it was in the Bronx, 564 E 158th st. was the last address. Since I don't know NYC at all, would not know where that was. She also said that the place had burned down, the whole block.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Are you for serious? LOLZ Can you imagine the dialogue??

Tom: Sam, hand back over the MF $100,000 dude

Sam: Why?

Tom: because some chick named cassie said I COULD do this. We are sending over a truck to p/u all of the kenmore appliances too.

---

And again you misrepresent me. You like doing that, or is it an accident?
At this moment, I'm choosing to believe that Tom is Honest. Given that, I know if I was talked into changing my mind on a decision due to being "Misinformed", I would do everything in my power to fix it. Yes, even if it stripped one winner over another. His name and rep are attached to the show, I'm sure he doesn't want to be remembered as someone easily dupable, or a person afraid to correct a wrong once he knows of it.


I mean seriously, If Sam "WON", he'd only be stripped of the win if the true order of events showed he should have been dq'ed before the final. If he wasn't to be dq'ed, no change in his win. Same for any of the others.

---

Uuuuuuuuuuuuuh... ooookaaay *ah coo-coo coo-coo coo-coo*

---

Are the words too big for you to understand?

Simple.

Let's assume Tom is both truthful in what he's said so far in the matter AND a standup person. The fact that SOMEONE lied to him about the sequencing, and therefore the nature of what happened to Marcel, may well indeed make a standup honest person rethink a decision and act accordingly. Notice I did not say that action would be to give the win to Marcel.


If Tom knows the real deal and is playing along with production and the story to do...well something I guess, then nothing will change.

I've never been a Marcel Fan, but I'm not a hater either. I think he should have to compete against the last 3 standing chefs that were not breaking contest rules in a way to get them DQ'ed. That would be fair, both by my understanding of the rules they agree to and by (I hope) society values that ganging up on people does not earn you a reward. That behavior would get them dq'ed from any smart kitchen in the world.

---

This is for M.[expletive deleted]- As you can see, Cassie did not get rude until YOU started with the "coo coo" crap. AND your little pissy joke about Tom taking back the prizes because "some chick named Cassie said I COULD do this". IF you have been reading these boards, you would realize that it is just your kind of rude remarks, made by other peeps, that caused a LOT of fighting between people. You didn't have to make fun of her opinion, just state WHY you don't agree. No, you didn't call her an idiot, you DID say she was coo coo, which would be calling her crazy. She, as well as anyone else, should be able to "voice" their opinion without "buttheads" making them feel like they have no choice but defend themselves it the same childish manner as they are attacked.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"Plus I didn't call anyone a butthead...that would be ROOD....lol"


Everytime I see Rood, it cracks me up.

brillke

---

It reminds me of full house episodes. lol

You go Bob Saget!

---

Jinx!!!

---

LOL.
I don't remember that one.... Care to refresh my memorex??

I don't know why but it cracked me up too....lol

---

The lovely pre eating disorder Olsen twins used to be known for saying "how rude" and it would come out ponouced roood.

I have done my best to purge any and every john stamos related memory from my brain but some just seem to stick in your head for years like bad 70's music

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Youd think we could agree to disagree, wouldnt ya? Go back and look at who is doing the most bashing. It aint the non Marcel fans doing the most, I assure you. Amazon has made it an art form to bash, even if she is dead wrong and proven to be so, yet continue on as if she is that God Warrior from Trading Spouses or whatever it was called.

---

It's only natural that X percent of people are going to pull for Marcel because he is most decidedly they underdog. That's completely understandable. But some of these folks cross the line of sanity into Conspiracy City.

---

People who poo-poo conspiracy theories are often the ones who benefit most from trying to deny a conspiracy exists.

Conspiracies, large and small, occur every day. When three teenage girls agree to secretly exclude one of their four-friend group from a common activity, that's a conspiracy. When a government invades another country based on lies told to the public, that's a conspiracy. It happens all the time.

To even try to denigrate "conspiracy theories" on a board about Top Chef is ridiculous. Ilan has actively conspired with others to get Marcel thrown off the show. Sam, Ilan, Elia and Cliff conspired to assault Marcel. Elia herself urged a conspiracy where they all would shave their heads and Marcel would be left with a full head of hair.

And the production staff has certainly opened itself wide to conspiracy theories.

---

Says the woman who works with plants and wears a aluminum foil helmet.

---

You know what WAJ..This will be the first and last time I ever do this...Peeps who continually argue with other peeps are just as bad as the peeps they are calling out to me...You may find this to be a verbal game of who is wittier.... smarter and more adept with the keyboard..But if you don't like Amazon.......why keep at her???

You must enjoy this somewhow so don't [expletive deleted] about it
if Amazon does it...It is getting far too nasty for me and it hurts to read this to tell you the truth....We need not hate so much no matter who started it..But I shall just
ignore and scroll on down the road and mind my own biz as I usually do cause life is just a bit too LONG to read anymore of this sh&t!!!!

And now I can understand why YOU like the Crack Pack...lol

---

====================================

Quote:

---

Yes, WAJ makes it a point to insult Amazon at every chance he can. Why? He was called a liar twice and even though he has proven he was not a liar and Amazon wrong, she cannot admit her mistakes. No, shed rather ride my ass for a mistake Ive apologized for and corrected.

---

This is what you're reduced to? Full-on attack of another poster? I know your disappointment in the actions of your Golden Boy must be a bitter pill to swallow, but turn your anger where it belongs...on him. He's the one who let you down, not me.

In the first place, I quite reading WAJ's posts a long time ago (unless they are included in a long series for quote, in which case it doesn't indicate all of the previous authors of quotes...but his style is pretty easy to pick out).

Second, WAJ picked me out as a target a long time ago. For you to indicate that the "lies" are the only reason I am not responding to him is "mischaracterizing" the reality of it. Obviously, if I haven't read his accusations of lying, then it was what he did before that triggered me to put him on ignore.

Third, you do not build your own credibility by propping up your favortites, especially when they are like WAJ. But then, you back Sam, don't you? And we know what kind of moral character he has.

Fourth, if you don't want to get thrown back at you what you've so eagerly spewed, then don't spew it in the first place. You really don't have a lot of high ground to stand on, you know.

Quote:

---

Is WAJ going too far? Maybe but its his right just as it is Amazons right to compare the chefs to sex offenders and wish them no future employment. The hate spewing from Amazons keyboard is every bit as wrong as the stupid prank gone horribly wrong committed by Cliff. Her fascination with Sam alone borderlines obsession.

---

Again, more of your "mischaracterizations." Please quote where I have compared the Assault Brigade to sex offenders. There are some similarities between sexual assaults and nonsexual assaults, which I have discussed: the "blaming the victim" mentality and the effects experienced by the victim afterwards.

Please quote where I have wished them no further employment. Really, your addiction to "mischaracterization" is apalling. I've discussed the possibility of someone involved in an assault on a colleague being employed again, and questioned whether their future employment will be harmed by their own actions. But I've NEVER wished them to not be employed.

And to state that what I post as the same as what Ilan, Sam, Cliff and Elia did to Marcel is freaking BIZARRE. You are in WAJ-land now.

I'M obsessed with Sam? Look in the mirror to see who is obsessed with Sam.

Say, did you ever figure out the answer to the question I posed to you which I've not seen you answer yet: "Do you believe that the actions of Cliff, Sam, Ilan and Elia in assaulting Marcel are those of a top chef?" If your answer is "no," then a follow-up question: "Then why do you still support them going to Hawaii?"

Quote:

---

I guess I am a Crack Pack supporter too,

brillke

---

IMO, yes, you are. You've also descended to the level of What a Joke.

Again, you write a blog. Do you believe showing your real "WhatAJoke" side to the public is a good reflection on you and the professionalism of your blog?

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

LMAO, yeah, JMe, going to be way too much going on here..may have to hide. Part of my point was that Cassie has just as much right to her opinion, AND that her reasoning was "possible" under certain conditions. However, one person just kept being a butthead and that is NO way to make a new poster welcome. There has been a lot of biatching about new peeps getting a lot of tude from long time posters. Who will win??? Anyones guess at this point. But Cassie has made a good point as far as I'm concerned, whether I agree or not. SOOOO, I am now stepping off my soap box...LOL

---

Too right....You go giiiiirl!

Here's the thing...I think you should never call a poster an idiot for what they think even though I would love to.

It is rood!!!!!

Take issue with the content.....not the poster.

Don't we all think peeps who do not agree with us are idiots??????.....lol
But calling them an idiot is just not very nice.

BTW..Has Mr JUSTME groveled for forgiveness on the hair cutting issue yet?????

I think he needs to do some serious groveling????

Maybe even buy you a nice present....Airplane tix to Hawaii would be nice:O))))

Since we are co Miss Savants of 2007..I go too!!!!

Woooooooohooooooooo

He'll be mincemeat...lol

---

LOLZ!! Im the butthead you all are referring to. BTW, I NEVER called anyone an idiot, you just read that into it. As much as Cassie has a right to her opinion we all do. She was the one who copped tude with me first with her implying that I was stupid (saying $hit like, "are the words too big for you?) Look, I could care less that she said that, but if you guys are going to rant & rave about expressing opinions while stepping on ppls toes, then I think you ought to extend me the same courtesy & rant & rave back at her for doing the exact same thing.

This whole thing started because I said, "Lay off the weed" Now if you guys don't get that I was joking then kindly remove the stick from your arses. Again, just kidding folks!!! Why is everyone so serious around here?

---

OH NO......Ms [expletive deleted]..lol..I didn't mean you at ALL.....I agree with much of what I have seen you have posted and you have been nice as far as I can tell...I never even read that whole thread and didn't even know you posted to Cassie.If Cassie did that well then youse two fight it out.
I ain't going back 300 pages.))))
I just meant in general....Sorry if you thought I meant you.........Oy and lol!!

Plus I didn't call anyone a butthead...that would be ROOD....lol

---

First, Kristl. It was MHO, just never named her. I have gone back and reposted with my comments on her posted reply to Cassie. I am sure she has been a friendly poster, just felt she was very rood to Cassie. JMHO and I do stick up for peeps when necessary

On a lighter note..My Aunt replied and it was in the Bronx, 564 E 158th st. was the last address. Since I don't know NYC at all, would not know where that was. She also said that the place had burned down, the whole block.

---

Oh lawd I never saw any of that.
I like that you stuck up and it was rood if that was what was said.I'm with you. I don't like that kind of stuff.But see how fast this can become a war?????.
Which I why I try to let peeps fight it out themselves or not name the peep...You did good as you were defending a newbie and you did it right as far as I can see.
You are the best as far as I'm concerned...You never flame anyone and are always respectful...Respect goes a long way!!! . ))))

---

(O: Thank you my savant co-host! I didn't name anyone for that exact reason. However, have tried to straighten it out with her. If not, so be it. I know I don't like feeling like my opinion means nothing and some people just don't/won't defend themselves for whatever reason. I do see how this can get out of control. I have defended Cassie, and have not seen any more posts by her LOL Guess that shows me. BUT, I do feel good about myself so guess all is well in the land of posters. I hope it is done. At least for me it is and will not make any more comments on the subject. Besides, this savant stuff really does take a lot of time...and lawd knows I have plenty of that!! Thanks for the kudos, BTW

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Youd think we could agree to disagree, wouldnt ya? Go back and look at who is doing the most bashing. It aint the non Marcel fans doing the most, I assure you. Amazon has made it an art form to bash, even if she is dead wrong and proven to be so, yet continue on as if she is that God Warrior from Trading Spouses or whatever it was called.

---

It's only natural that X percent of people are going to pull for Marcel because he is most decidedly they underdog. That's completely understandable. But some of these folks cross the line of sanity into Conspiracy City.

---

People who poo-poo conspiracy theories are often the ones who benefit most from trying to deny a conspiracy exists.

Conspiracies, large and small, occur every day. When three teenage girls agree to secretly exclude one of their four-friend group from a common activity, that's a conspiracy. When a government invades another country based on lies told to the public, that's a conspiracy. It happens all the time.

To even try to denigrate "conspiracy theories" on a board about Top Chef is ridiculous. Ilan has actively conspired with others to get Marcel thrown off the show. Sam, Ilan, Elia and Cliff conspired to assault Marcel. Elia herself urged a conspiracy where they all would shave their heads and Marcel would be left with a full head of hair.

And the production staff has certainly opened itself wide to conspiracy theories.

---

Says the woman who works with plants and wears a aluminum foil helmet.

---

You know what WAJ..This will be the first and last time I ever do this...Peeps who continually argue with other peeps are just as bad as the peeps they are calling out to me...You may find this to be a verbal game of who is wittier.... smarter and more adept with the keyboard..But if you don't like Amazon.......why keep at her???

You must enjoy this somewhow so don't [expletive deleted] about it
if Amazon does it...It is getting far too nasty for me and it hurts to read this to tell you the truth....We need not hate so much no matter who started it..But I shall just
ignore and scroll on down the road and mind my own biz as I usually do cause life is just a bit too LONG to read anymore of this sh&t!!!!

And now I can understand why YOU like the Crack Pack...lol

---

====================================

Quote:

---

Yes, WAJ makes it a point to insult Amazon at every chance he can. Why? He was called a liar twice and even though he has proven he was not a liar and Amazon wrong, she cannot admit her mistakes. No, shed rather ride my ass for a mistake Ive apologized for and corrected.

---

This is what you're reduced to? Full-on attack of another poster? I know your disappointment in the actions of your Golden Boy must be a bitter pill to swallow, but turn your anger where it belongs...on him. He's the one who let you down, not me.

In the first place, I quite reading WAJ's posts a long time ago (unless they are included in a long series for quote, in which case it doesn't indicate all of the previous authors of quotes...but his style is pretty easy to pick out).

Second, WAJ picked me out as a target a long time ago. For you to indicate that the "lies" are the only reason I am not responding to him is "mischaracterizing" the reality of it. Obviously, if I haven't read his accusations of lying, then it was what he did before that triggered me to put him on ignore.

Third, you do not build your own credibility by propping up your favortites, especially when they are like WAJ. But then, you back Sam, don't you? And we know what kind of moral character he has.

Fourth, if you don't want to get thrown back at you what you've so eagerly spewed, then don't spew it in the first place. You really don't have a lot of high ground to stand on, you know.

Quote:

---

Is WAJ going too far? Maybe but its his right just as it is Amazons right to compare the chefs to sex offenders and wish them no future employment. The hate spewing from Amazons keyboard is every bit as wrong as the stupid prank gone horribly wrong committed by Cliff. Her fascination with Sam alone borderlines obsession.

---

Again, more of your "mischaracterizations." Please quote where I have compared the Assault Brigade to sex offenders. There are some similarities between sexual assaults and nonsexual assaults, which I have discussed: the "blaming the victim" mentality and the effects experienced by the victim afterwards.

Please quote where I have wished them no further employment. Really, your addiction to "mischaracterization" is apalling. I've discussed the possibility of someone involved in an assault on a colleague being employed again, and questioned whether their future employment will be harmed by their own actions. But I've NEVER wished them to not be employed.

And to state that what I post as the same as what Ilan, Sam, Cliff and Elia did to Marcel is freaking BIZARRE. You are in WAJ-land now.

I'M obsessed with Sam? Look in the mirror to see who is obsessed with Sam.

Say, did you ever figure out the answer to the question I posed to you which I've not seen you answer yet: "Do you believe that the actions of Cliff, Sam, Ilan and Elia in assaulting Marcel are those of a top chef?" If your answer is "no," then a follow-up question: "Then why do you still support them going to Hawaii?"

Quote:

---

I guess I am a Crack Pack supporter too,

brillke

---

IMO, yes, you are. You've also descended to the level of What a Joke.

Again, you write a blog. Do you believe showing your real "WhatAJoke" side to the public is a good reflection on you and the professionalism of your blog?

---

Shazam! I can't even begin to ferret out whose "voice" is whose anymore in the above. As creepily cliched as it sounds, if we can't all forgive and forget, couldn't we at least just live and let live?

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Youd think we could agree to disagree, wouldnt ya? Go back and look at who is doing the most bashing. It aint the non Marcel fans doing the most, I assure you. Amazon has made it an art form to bash, even if she is dead wrong and proven to be so, yet continue on as if she is that God Warrior from Trading Spouses or whatever it was called.

---

It's only natural that X percent of people are going to pull for Marcel because he is most decidedly they underdog. That's completely understandable. But some of these folks cross the line of sanity into Conspiracy City.

---

People who poo-poo conspiracy theories are often the ones who benefit most from trying to deny a conspiracy exists.

Conspiracies, large and small, occur every day. When three teenage girls agree to secretly exclude one of their four-friend group from a common activity, that's a conspiracy. When a government invades another country based on lies told to the public, that's a conspiracy. It happens all the time.

To even try to denigrate "conspiracy theories" on a board about Top Chef is ridiculous. Ilan has actively conspired with others to get Marcel thrown off the show. Sam, Ilan, Elia and Cliff conspired to assault Marcel. Elia herself urged a conspiracy where they all would shave their heads and Marcel would be left with a full head of hair.

And the production staff has certainly opened itself wide to conspiracy theories.

---

Says the woman who works with plants and wears a aluminum foil helmet.

---

You know what WAJ..This will be the first and last time I ever do this...Peeps who continually argue with other peeps are just as bad as the peeps they are calling out to me...You may find this to be a verbal game of who is wittier.... smarter and more adept with the keyboard..But if you don't like Amazon.......why keep at her???

You must enjoy this somewhow so don't [expletive deleted] about it
if Amazon does it...It is getting far too nasty for me and it hurts to read this to tell you the truth....We need not hate so much no matter who started it..But I shall just
ignore and scroll on down the road and mind my own biz as I usually do cause life is just a bit too LONG to read anymore of this sh&t!!!!

And now I can understand why YOU like the Crack Pack...lol

---

====================================

Quote:

---

Yes, WAJ makes it a point to insult Amazon at every chance he can. Why? He was called a liar twice and even though he has proven he was not a liar and Amazon wrong, she cannot admit her mistakes. No, shed rather ride my ass for a mistake Ive apologized for and corrected.

---

This is what you're reduced to? Full-on attack of another poster? I know your disappointment in the actions of your Golden Boy must be a bitter pill to swallow, but turn your anger where it belongs...on him. He's the one who let you down, not me.

In the first place, I quite reading WAJ's posts a long time ago (unless they are included in a long series for quote, in which case it doesn't indicate all of the previous authors of quotes...but his style is pretty easy to pick out).

Second, WAJ picked me out as a target a long time ago. For you to indicate that the "lies" are the only reason I am not responding to him is "mischaracterizing" the reality of it. Obviously, if I haven't read his accusations of lying, then it was what he did before that triggered me to put him on ignore.

Third, you do not build your own credibility by propping up your favortites, especially when they are like WAJ. But then, you back Sam, don't you? And we know what kind of moral character he has.

Fourth, if you don't want to get thrown back at you what you've so eagerly spewed, then don't spew it in the first place. You really don't have a lot of high ground to stand on, you know.

Quote:

---

Is WAJ going too far? Maybe but its his right just as it is Amazons right to compare the chefs to sex offenders and wish them no future employment. The hate spewing from Amazons keyboard is every bit as wrong as the stupid prank gone horribly wrong committed by Cliff. Her fascination with Sam alone borderlines obsession.

---

Again, more of your "mischaracterizations." Please quote where I have compared the Assault Brigade to sex offenders. There are some similarities between sexual assaults and nonsexual assaults, which I have discussed: the "blaming the victim" mentality and the effects experienced by the victim afterwards.

Please quote where I have wished them no further employment. Really, your addiction to "mischaracterization" is apalling. I've discussed the possibility of someone involved in an assault on a colleague being employed again, and questioned whether their future employment will be harmed by their own actions. But I've NEVER wished them to not be employed.

And to state that what I post as the same as what Ilan, Sam, Cliff and Elia did to Marcel is freaking BIZARRE. You are in WAJ-land now.

I'M obsessed with Sam? Look in the mirror to see who is obsessed with Sam.

Say, did you ever figure out the answer to the question I posed to you which I've not seen you answer yet: "Do you believe that the actions of Cliff, Sam, Ilan and Elia in assaulting Marcel are those of a top chef?" If your answer is "no," then a follow-up question: "Then why do you still support them going to Hawaii?"

Quote:

---

I guess I am a Crack Pack supporter too,

brillke

---

IMO, yes, you are. You've also descended to the level of What a Joke.

Again, you write a blog. Do you believe showing your real "WhatAJoke" side to the public is a good reflection on you and the professionalism of your blog?

---

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

(O: Thank you my savant co-host! I didn't name anyone for that exact reason. However, have tried to straighten it out with her. If not, so be it. I know I don't like feeling like my opinion means nothing and some people just don't/won't defend themselves for whatever reason. I do see how this can get out of control. I have defended Cassie, and have not seen any more posts by her LOL Guess that shows me. BUT, I do feel good about myself so guess all is well in the land of posters. I hope it is done. At least for me it is and will not make any more comments on the subject. Besides, this savant stuff really does take a lot of time...and lawd knows I have plenty of that!! Thanks for the kudos, BTW

---

Actually, if you want to get technical about it, you were the one who kept on bringing it up & back to the forefront. Like I said, I did explain to he why I disagreed in the post just after the one's you've been posting. And that was the end of it. She didn't reply back. And it was you, kind sir, who kept on bringing it up. So please don't act like you don't like seeing a disagreement go on page after page. Because if that were really true then nothing should have been brought up after my last post to her.

---

Somebody didn't take their happy pills I guess. I apologized once, and WILL NOT DO IT AGAIN. AND, I am guessing since you call yourself a [expletive deleted] that you are a female. I to am female, not a sir...so just get over yourself. And as JustMe would say...END OF THE LINE

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Hello, All! I would like to ask a very sincere question. I promise I am not trying to provoke. What is it that everyone sees in Marcel that makes him so popular?

---

Like you, I'm honestly interested in the answers you receive, Miss O. Seriously. Other than the facts that he's been deemed the "underdog," and he's weathered some proverbial "hard knocks," I'm not sure.

I'm sure there are plenty here who will enlighten us, though.

---

Me too.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

(O: Thank you my savant co-host! I didn't name anyone for that exact reason. However, have tried to straighten it out with her. If not, so be it. I know I don't like feeling like my opinion means nothing and some people just don't/won't defend themselves for whatever reason. I do see how this can get out of control. I have defended Cassie, and have not seen any more posts by her LOL Guess that shows me. BUT, I do feel good about myself so guess all is well in the land of posters. I hope it is done. At least for me it is and will not make any more comments on the subject. Besides, this savant stuff really does take a lot of time...and lawd knows I have plenty of that!! Thanks for the kudos, BTW

---

Actually, if you want to get technical about it, you were the one who kept on bringing it up & back to the forefront. Like I said, I did explain to he why I disagreed in the post just after the one's you've been posting. And that was the end of it. She didn't reply back. And it was you, kind sir, who kept on bringing it up. So please don't act like you don't like seeing a disagreement go on page after page. Because if that were really true then nothing should have been brought up after my last post to her.

---

NO NO......Peace....Back to peace...lol

Peace is a GOOD thing!!!!!

I'm buzay as Saint Marcel would say..I have my
work <scissors with the hands> cut out 4 me!!!

HOLSTER...Curry brine chix??????
You HAVE to be my gay...lol

Yummy.

Swishy is a legend on my YW site and we have Swishy sightings all the time..His fave song is
It's Raining Men.....and he has a rainbow collar
What else would he have????!!!

See yoz later....Goooooo Marcel!!!!!....lol

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

(O: Thank you my savant co-host! I didn't name anyone for that exact reason. However, have tried to straighten it out with her. If not, so be it. I know I don't like feeling like my opinion means nothing and some people just don't/won't defend themselves for whatever reason. I do see how this can get out of control. I have defended Cassie, and have not seen any more posts by her LOL Guess that shows me. BUT, I do feel good about myself so guess all is well in the land of posters. I hope it is done. At least for me it is and will not make any more comments on the subject. Besides, this savant stuff really does take a lot of time...and lawd knows I have plenty of that!! Thanks for the kudos, BTW

---

Actually, if you want to get technical about it, you were the one who kept on bringing it up & back to the forefront. Like I said, I did explain to he why I disagreed in the post just after the one's you've been posting. And that was the end of it. She didn't reply back. And it was you, kind sir, who kept on bringing it up. So please don't act like you don't like seeing a disagreement go on page after page. Because if that were really true then nothing should have been brought up after my last post to her.

---

NO NO......Peace....Back to peace...lol

Peace is a GOOD thing!!!!!

I'm buzay as Saint Marcel would say..I have my
work <scissors with the hands> cut out 4 me!!!

HOLSTER...Curry brine chix??????
You HAVE to be my gay...lol

Yummy.

Swishy is a legend on my YW site and we have Swishy sightings all the time..His fave song is
It's Raining Men.....and he has a rainbow collar
What else would he have????!!!

See yoz later....Goooooo Marcel!!!!!....lol

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Just watermelon and blue cheese, right? LOL.

---

YUCK... I haven't tried that one either

What the hell was he thinking?

---

it's probably been said, but I didn't want to forget if not. That was Sam not Marcel. and wasn't he arrogant when he said if he was a bigger name it would have been well received! dang!

---