Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Ok, folks, "DianaRuggles" is not the noob she pretends to be. This individual is highly conversant with the mechanics of the board and knows how to flip from board to board with ease.

WE'VE BEEN SCAMMED.

Fact: Ruggles first registered at 4:20 pm this afternoon. Then, during a period of exactly EIGHT MINUTES, Ruggles posts the spoiler link to the Food & Wine article SEVEN TIMES, flipping from one Top Chef board to another with an ease that no noob can possibly have, as follows:

1. 4:24 posts spoiler link on Episode 12 board
2. 4:25 posts spoiler link on Episode 209 board
3. 4:26 posts spoiler link on The Judges board
4. 4:27 posts spoiler link on Top Chef Recipe board
5. 4:28 posts spoiler link on Episode 210 board
6. 4:29 posts spoiler link on Episode 207 board
7. 4:31 Episode 12 board again, this time posting the full text of the article.

FACT: This was a deliberate champaign by a highly experienced board user to plant the article and spread news about it far and wide, immediately.

And who do I think was the culprit? I give you the following information:

4:23 Justme posts on the Episode 12 board
4:28 Justme posts a tiny post on Epi 12 board
4:32, 4:52, 4:53,4:56,4:59, more tiny posts.
NOW:
5:04 posts response to 6. above
5:06: posts same response to 5. above
5:13 posts same response to 2. above
5: 15 posts same response to 3. above
5: 17 posts same response to 4. above
5:24 rejoins Episode 12 board without a peep about all this unusual activity by "Ms. Ruggles" in blowing the secret wide open on SIX OTHER BOARDS. NOT A SINGLE WORD.

You be the judge. I've made up my mind.

---

JustMe is the one who leaked the spoiler as DianneRuggles or whatever? Are you on crack?

---

Some highly experienced person did it. (And we got it first - Twop didn't get it until 5:06 pm). I infer Justme because of the silence about this thing simultaneously popping up on the other boards, which Justme's responsive posts indicate he knew very well.

I mean, who would play possum about that?

---

Im sorry but Im confused. Why does it have to be a highly experianced person? Am I missing something?

---

Yes it has to be a highly experienced person.

In the space of eleven minutes flat, Ruggles:
--Logged in for the first time ever and waited three minutes. Then,
---pulled up the Top Chef index, selected Epi 12, and correctly made a post using "reply" rather than fumbling around with BravoBoardBoss, as we all did as noobs.
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 209, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected The Judges, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Top Recipe, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 210, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 207, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Retruned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 12, correctly posted the full text of an article using "reply"

Dang, girl, that's a major feat. Even we couldn't do it that fast!!! That was one singularly virtuoso performance. And, done without a single question asked about how to switch to another board, how to post, etc. Of course this is somebody well-versed in using these boards.

---

anybody who has ever posted before on any of the Bravo boards would know how it works. It would not take an 'experienced person'..it would just take anyone who has ever posted for ANY length of time. I am sorry but I do not find how this person posted to be so 'spectacular' in any way really. It really would not take a rocket scientist...ya know?

---

So you concede that this noob wasn't really a noob at all and came on with the clear intent to post this article far and wide immediately?

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

THIS JUST IN:
MARCEL LOST DEAL WITH IT!!

GOOOOOOOOO ILAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Ok, folks, "DianaRuggles" is not the noob she pretends to be. This individual is highly conversant with the mechanics of the board and knows how to flip from board to board with ease.

WE'VE BEEN SCAMMED.

Fact: Ruggles first registered at 4:20 pm this afternoon. Then, during a period of exactly EIGHT MINUTES, Ruggles posts the spoiler link to the Food & Wine article SEVEN TIMES, flipping from one Top Chef board to another with an ease that no noob can possibly have, as follows:

1. 4:24 posts spoiler link on Episode 12 board
2. 4:25 posts spoiler link on Episode 209 board
3. 4:26 posts spoiler link on The Judges board
4. 4:27 posts spoiler link on Top Chef Recipe board
5. 4:28 posts spoiler link on Episode 210 board
6. 4:29 posts spoiler link on Episode 207 board
7. 4:31 Episode 12 board again, this time posting the full text of the article.

FACT: This was a deliberate champaign by a highly experienced board user to plant the article and spread news about it far and wide, immediately.

And who do I think was the culprit? I give you the following information:

4:23 Justme posts on the Episode 12 board
4:28 Justme posts a tiny post on Epi 12 board
4:32, 4:52, 4:53,4:56,4:59, more tiny posts.
NOW:
5:04 posts response to 6. above
5:06: posts same response to 5. above
5:13 posts same response to 2. above
5: 15 posts same response to 3. above
5: 17 posts same response to 4. above
5:24 rejoins Episode 12 board without a peep about all this unusual activity by "Ms. Ruggles" in blowing the secret wide open on SIX OTHER BOARDS. NOT A SINGLE WORD.

You be the judge. I've made up my mind.

---

JustMe is the one who leaked the spoiler as DianneRuggles or whatever? Are you on crack?

---

Some highly experienced person did it. (And we got it first - Twop didn't get it until 5:06 pm). I infer Justme because of the silence about this thing simultaneously popping up on the other boards, which Justme's responsive posts indicate he knew very well.

I mean, who would play possum about that?

---

Im sorry but Im confused. Why does it have to be a highly experianced person? Am I missing something?

---

Yes it has to be a highly experienced person.

In the space of eleven minutes flat, Ruggles:
--Logged in for the first time ever and waited three minutes. Then,
---pulled up the Top Chef index, selected Epi 12, and correctly made a post using "reply" rather than fumbling around with BravoBoardBoss, as we all did as noobs.
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 209, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected The Judges, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Top Recipe, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 210, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 207, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Retruned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 12, correctly posted the full text of an article using "reply"

Dang, girl, that's a major feat. Even we couldn't do it that fast!!! That was one singularly virtuoso performance. And, done without a single question asked about how to switch to another board, how to post, etc. Of course this is somebody well-versed in using these boards.

---

anybody who has ever posted before on any of the Bravo boards would know how it works. It would not take an 'experienced person'..it would just take anyone who has ever posted for ANY length of time. I am sorry but I do not find how this person posted to be so 'spectacular' in any way really. It really would not take a rocket scientist...ya know?

---

So you concede that this noob wasn't really a noob at all and came on with the clear intent to post this article far and wide immediately?

---

Yes. I agree. All I am saying is that anyone who has ever been on the boards could have done that. What I had a problem with was your basic accusation(and yes that is what is was) towards justme of being involved in some conspiracy, and that the person posting had to be 'very experienced". I do not believe you should have singled out justme like that..and I think anyone with just about any experience could have made the posts. Not a newbie, but not necessarily 'very experienced' either. When did the new person register? And..my main question..Why does any of this matter??? I do not get the point..lol

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

Wow.
You're kind of nuts.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

SO I GUESS

CIRCUMFERENCE OVER PI R SQUARED TIMES TWO???

---

Silly, everybody know pi r round!!!

AI

---

LOL AI

YOU SIZ AND ACTOR

KILL ME LOL

DAM I NEVER LAUGHED THIS MUCH AND THIS LONG

IN AWHILE

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Ok, folks, "DianaRuggles" is not the noob she pretends to be. This individual is highly conversant with the mechanics of the board and knows how to flip from board to board with ease.

WE'VE BEEN SCAMMED.

Fact: Ruggles first registered at 4:20 pm this afternoon. Then, during a period of exactly EIGHT MINUTES, Ruggles posts the spoiler link to the Food & Wine article SEVEN TIMES, flipping from one Top Chef board to another with an ease that no noob can possibly have, as follows:

1. 4:24 posts spoiler link on Episode 12 board
2. 4:25 posts spoiler link on Episode 209 board
3. 4:26 posts spoiler link on The Judges board
4. 4:27 posts spoiler link on Top Chef Recipe board
5. 4:28 posts spoiler link on Episode 210 board
6. 4:29 posts spoiler link on Episode 207 board
7. 4:31 Episode 12 board again, this time posting the full text of the article.

FACT: This was a deliberate champaign by a highly experienced board user to plant the article and spread news about it far and wide, immediately.

And who do I think was the culprit? I give you the following information:

4:23 Justme posts on the Episode 12 board
4:28 Justme posts a tiny post on Epi 12 board
4:32, 4:52, 4:53,4:56,4:59, more tiny posts.
NOW:
5:04 posts response to 6. above
5:06: posts same response to 5. above
5:13 posts same response to 2. above
5: 15 posts same response to 3. above
5: 17 posts same response to 4. above
5:24 rejoins Episode 12 board without a peep about all this unusual activity by "Ms. Ruggles" in blowing the secret wide open on SIX OTHER BOARDS. NOT A SINGLE WORD.

You be the judge. I've made up my mind.

---

JustMe is the one who leaked the spoiler as DianneRuggles or whatever? Are you on crack?

---

Some highly experienced person did it. (And we got it first - Twop didn't get it until 5:06 pm). I infer Justme because of the silence about this thing simultaneously popping up on the other boards, which Justme's responsive posts indicate he knew very well.

I mean, who would play possum about that?

---

Im sorry but Im confused. Why does it have to be a highly experianced person? Am I missing something?

---

Yes it has to be a highly experienced person.

In the space of eleven minutes flat, Ruggles:
--Logged in for the first time ever and waited three minutes. Then,
---pulled up the Top Chef index, selected Epi 12, and correctly made a post using "reply" rather than fumbling around with BravoBoardBoss, as we all did as noobs.
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 209, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected The Judges, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Top Recipe, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 210, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Returned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 207, correctly made a post using "reply"
---Retruned to the Top Chef index, selected Epi 12, correctly posted the full text of an article using "reply"

Dang, girl, that's a major feat. Even we couldn't do it that fast!!! That was one singularly virtuoso performance. And, done without a single question asked about how to switch to another board, how to post, etc. Of course this is somebody well-versed in using these boards.

---

anybody who has ever posted before on any of the Bravo boards would know how it works. It would not take an 'experienced person'..it would just take anyone who has ever posted for ANY length of time. I am sorry but I do not find how this person posted to be so 'spectacular' in any way really. It really would not take a rocket scientist...ya know?

---

So you concede that this noob wasn't really a noob at all and came on with the clear intent to post this article far and wide immediately?

---

Yes. I agree. All I am saying is that anyone who has ever been on the boards could have done that. What I had a problem with was your basic accusation(and yes that is what is was) towards justme of being involved in some conspiracy, and that the person posting had to be 'very experienced". I do not believe you should have singled out justme like that..and I think anyone with just about any experience could have made the posts. Not a newbie, but not necessarily 'very experienced' either. When did the new person register? And..my main question..Why does any of this matter??? I do not get the point..lol

---

"When did this new person register?" Three minutes before the blitz. Read the above chronology again.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

SO I GUESS

CIRCUMFERENCE OVER PI R SQUARED TIMES TWO???

---

Silly, everybody know pi r round!!!

AI

---

LOL AI

YOU SIZ AND ACTOR

KILL ME LOL

DAM I NEVER LAUGHED THIS MUCH AND THIS LONG

IN AWHILE

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Aww, shucks. Glad I gave you a chuckle, I like my humor funny, not mean. It's a clean version of an old punchline. So, do you want coconut creme or cherry? Or both? Maybe banana?
AI

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

As you well know, the game I was referring to was having posts on different boards at once when you pull up the main index page due to simultaneously participating in conversations on several boards at once. The most I ever did was three at once, because the action was fast and furious on each of the PR boards. It was hard to keep up with multiple fast-paced conversations at once. Everybody was doing it, until somebody mentioned that we should just stick to a single board to save our collective sanity.

You, however, have lately hit every single board on the Top Chef page, even though some of those episode boards have languished for months without any action. To me, this is total-building, which is why I asked you if there is yet another title beyond Afficionado. You certainly seem in a hurry to crack the record for most posts, especially because you are posting where nobody else is talking much at all.

I did notice your heavy activity today and commented on it. Then, the light bulb went off and I tracked your posts to see if the mystery leaker was you, perchance. Only you and the mystery leaker have posted on so many inactive boards, and by an unusual "coinkydink," all on the very same day, and during the same hour.

It wasn't an entirely loopy scenario.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

As you well know, the game I was referring to was having posts on different boards at once when you pull up the main index page due to simultaneously participating in conversations on several boards at once. The most I ever did was three at once, because the action was fast and furious on each of the PR boards. It was hard to keep up with multiple fast-paced conversations at once. Everybody was doing it, until somebody mentioned that we should just stick to a single board to save our collective sanity.

You, however, have lately hit every single board on the Top Chef page, even though some of those episode boards have languished for months without any action. To me, this is total-building, which is why I asked you if there is yet another title beyond Afficionado. You certainly seem in a hurry to crack the record for most posts, especially because you are posting where nobody else is talking much at all.

I did notice your heavy activity today and commented on it. Then, the light bulb went off and I tracked your posts to see if the mystery leaker was you, perchance. Only you and the mystery leaker have posted on so many inactive boards, and by an unusual "coinkydink," all on the very same day, and during the same hour.

It wasn't an entirely loopy scenario.

---

GIVE IT UP CG

YOU'RE BUSTED

END OF LINE

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

As you well know, the game I was referring to was having posts on different boards at once when you pull up the main index page due to simultaneously participating in conversations on several boards at once. The most I ever did was three at once, because the action was fast and furious on each of the PR boards. It was hard to keep up with multiple fast-paced conversations at once. Everybody was doing it, until somebody mentioned that we should just stick to a single board to save our collective sanity.

You, however, have lately hit every single board on the Top Chef page, even though some of those episode boards have languished for months without any action. To me, this is total-building, which is why I asked you if there is yet another title beyond Afficionado. You certainly seem in a hurry to crack the record for most posts, especially because you are posting where nobody else is talking much at all.

I did notice your heavy activity today and commented on it. Then, the light bulb went off and I tracked your posts to see if the mystery leaker was you, perchance. Only you and the mystery leaker have posted on so many inactive boards, and by an unusual "coinkydink," all on the very same day, and during the same hour.

It wasn't an entirely loopy scenario.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

As you well know, the game I was referring to was having posts on different boards at once when you pull up the main index page due to simultaneously participating in conversations on several boards at once. The most I ever did was three at once, because the action was fast and furious on each of the PR boards. It was hard to keep up with multiple fast-paced conversations at once. Everybody was doing it, until somebody mentioned that we should just stick to a single board to save our collective sanity.

You, however, have lately hit every single board on the Top Chef page, even though some of those episode boards have languished for months without any action. To me, this is total-building, which is why I asked you if there is yet another title beyond Afficionado. You certainly seem in a hurry to crack the record for most posts, especially because you are posting where nobody else is talking much at all.

I did notice your heavy activity today and commented on it. Then, the light bulb went off and I tracked your posts to see if the mystery leaker was you, perchance. Only you and the mystery leaker have posted on so many inactive boards, and by an unusual "coinkydink," all on the very same day, and during the same hour.

It wasn't an entirely loopy scenario.

---

GIVE IT UP CG

YOU'RE BUSTED

END OF LINE

---

Sorry you can't read well. I have just explained in an earlier post that I can't manage to post under two different names from the same IP address, otherwise I'd resume posting under my old name rather than having to use my houseguest's substitute. For some technical reason, I just can't have two different people using two different Bravo names on this computer. Or, even one person using two names. Thus, I am not today's mystery leaker.

You, on the other hand, protest too much. I'm guessing you have one computer on a DSL and another on a separate cable service, so that the Bravo program reads two different IP addresses.

BUSTED YOURSELF.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

As you well know, the game I was referring to was having posts on different boards at once when you pull up the main index page due to simultaneously participating in conversations on several boards at once. The most I ever did was three at once, because the action was fast and furious on each of the PR boards. It was hard to keep up with multiple fast-paced conversations at once. Everybody was doing it, until somebody mentioned that we should just stick to a single board to save our collective sanity.

You, however, have lately hit every single board on the Top Chef page, even though some of those episode boards have languished for months without any action. To me, this is total-building, which is why I asked you if there is yet another title beyond Afficionado. You certainly seem in a hurry to crack the record for most posts, especially because you are posting where nobody else is talking much at all.

I did notice your heavy activity today and commented on it. Then, the light bulb went off and I tracked your posts to see if the mystery leaker was you, perchance. Only you and the mystery leaker have posted on so many inactive boards, and by an unusual "coinkydink," all on the very same day, and during the same hour.

It wasn't an entirely loopy scenario.

---

BY THE WAY CG

TOP OF PAGE 288 EPISODE 209

TITLE SEVEN

YOUR POST ONCE AGAIN

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


ADD THAT TO ALL THE NAME GAMES

YOU HAVE ACCUMALATED IN THIS THREAD ALONE

PLUS THE ABILITY TO "COLOR" YOUR QUOTES


SHOWS YOU HAVE CLEAR KNOWLEGE OF THE WORKINGS

OF THE BOARD AS WELL

ADD THE REPLIES YOU HAVE GIVEN BRILLK

ABOUT ANOTHER IDENTITY

YOUR KNOWLEGE OF TWOP

BRINGING STUFF FROM THERE TO HERE


AND THE FACT YOU LIED ABOUT THAT POST

SHRUG

YOU'RE JUST BUSTED

END OF LINE

Snark! I've made a compelling circumstantial case for you being the secret leaker. You just keep blaming me, rather than proving that you're not. Yes, I have a lot of experience on the board, as I racked up quite a lot of conversations under the former name FoodFanOne. Mere experience on the board doesn't make me the guilty one, here.

Your're cracked. I haven't lied about any posting. Nor do I have the technical ability to play games by posting under two games at once. You, on the other hand, have indeed been everywhere at once today, including in the vicinity of the leaker wherever he/she went. Anybody who pulls up the master list of Top Chef boards can see that for themselves.

As for the ability to "color" my quotes? Wow, glad you noticed my great writing.

Give it up, Justme. I'm not saying fer sure, nor have I ever, that you're the mystery leaker. But, despite having many chances to do so, you sure haven't made a direct and unqualified claim that you're not.

Instead of calling me a liar, why don't you just state clearly whether it's you or not? Have you been posting under two names concurrently? And, if so, are you or anybody else subject to your direction or control today's mystery leaker of the Food & Wine article?

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

So someone who has been/is currently on the boards found the article and posted it quickly in numerous places, using a new name(maybe so they could remain anonymous?)..where does that leave us..??? I just do not get the point of your analysis or where it could be leading??????

---

Well, that's what is so interesting. The pattern doesn't seem to be that of a normal posting leak, like being raised in one post and then catching on like wildfire as others repeat it. Somebody here deliberately torched a wildfire from the get-go.

So, I'm leaning toward a Bravo "plant," with the full cooperation of Food & Wine mag, of disinformation to keep us interested until the bitter end. I just don't see any other logical explanation for the way this whole thing came down.

These guys re-cut an entire video to mislead us about the sequence of events. Is it such a stretch to think they might fake up a well-written article with the wrong outcome and get it "leaked" just two days before the grand finale? Bravo is shameless enough to do it, IMO.

---

See..actually the way I see it..somebody familar with this board and TWoP just stumbled across it/found out about it somehow and then acting like a giddy moron, posted it all over the place like a twunt so they could bask in the glory of being the 'notifying part'..at least in their own mind. I think that this analysis is just as plausible as the 'plant' theory. Why would Bravo/Fewd and Whine really want to go down this road? Personally if this IS a red-herring planted to throw us off I think it would be fantastic and way to go! for them..but I suspect it would really come off damaging Bravo/Fewd and Whine in many more ways actually. Your theory may be right, but as of now it is no more right than several other possibilities. Ok>? not trying to fight with ya but just saying...

Also the 'attack' sequence change was something i believe they tried to change to cover their butts, to mislead us so they would not look bad...I think they thought they could pull that off..definitely different scenario than this.

---

Fewd and Wine - LOL!

Actually, I don't think they reworked the video to cover their butts. I think it was simply a crass grab for maximum "drama." The re-cut seemed to me to be the correct order to lead up to the big, dramatic moment. You could see why they would do it this way. If they showed the attack first and then the head-shaving, the drama fizzles and we would be left just thinking that they are all mental. That that was, in fact, the true sequence of events and true impression to be drawn from it would be irrelevant to a film editor going for maximum impact, here.

---

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


YOUR POST CG

AND YES I DO NOTICE YOU LIKE TO PLAY GAMES

END OF LINE

---

As you well know, the game I was referring to was having posts on different boards at once when you pull up the main index page due to simultaneously participating in conversations on several boards at once. The most I ever did was three at once, because the action was fast and furious on each of the PR boards. It was hard to keep up with multiple fast-paced conversations at once. Everybody was doing it, until somebody mentioned that we should just stick to a single board to save our collective sanity.

You, however, have lately hit every single board on the Top Chef page, even though some of those episode boards have languished for months without any action. To me, this is total-building, which is why I asked you if there is yet another title beyond Afficionado. You certainly seem in a hurry to crack the record for most posts, especially because you are posting where nobody else is talking much at all.

I did notice your heavy activity today and commented on it. Then, the light bulb went off and I tracked your posts to see if the mystery leaker was you, perchance. Only you and the mystery leaker have posted on so many inactive boards, and by an unusual "coinkydink," all on the very same day, and during the same hour.

It wasn't an entirely loopy scenario.

---

BY THE WAY CG

TOP OF PAGE 288 EPISODE 209

TITLE SEVEN

YOUR POST ONCE AGAIN

Loyal Viewer



Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 362
Loc: Snarkland
Re: Interview [Re: JUSTMEAOD]
#164883 - 01/29/07 05:28 AM Edit Reply Quote



HA! I used to play this game, too, when originally posing on another name. You almost scored a deca-fecta on the main Top Chef index just now. Wooo.


ADD THAT TO ALL THE NAME GAMES

YOU HAVE ACCUMALATED IN THIS THREAD ALONE

PLUS THE ABILITY TO "COLOR" YOUR QUOTES


SHOWS YOU HAVE CLEAR KNOWLEGE OF THE WORKINGS

OF THE BOARD AS WELL

ADD THE REPLIES YOU HAVE GIVEN BRILLK

ABOUT ANOTHER IDENTITY

YOUR KNOWLEGE OF TWOP

BRINGING STUFF FROM THERE TO HERE


AND THE FACT YOU LIED ABOUT THAT POST

SHRUG

YOU'RE JUST BUSTED

END OF LINE

Snark! I've made a compelling circumstantial case for you being the secret leaker. You just keep blaming me, rather than proving that you're not. Yes, I have a lot of experience on the board, as I racked up quite a lot of conversations under the former name FoodFanOne. Mere experience on the board doesn't make me the guilty one, here.

Your're cracked. I haven't lied about any posting. Nor do I have the technical ability to play games by posting under two games at once. You, on the other hand, have indeed been everywhere at once today, including in the vicinity of the leaker wherever he/she went. Anybody who pulls up the master list of Top Chef boards can see that for themselves.

As for the ability to "color" my quotes? Wow, glad you noticed my great writing.

Give it up, Justme. I'm not saying fer sure, nor have I ever, that you're the mystery leaker. But, despite having many chances to do so, you sure haven't made a direct and unqualified claim that you're not.

Instead of calling me a liar, why don't you just state clearly whether it's you or not? Have you been posting under two names concurrently? And, if so, are you or anybody else subject to your direction or control today's mystery leaker of the Food & Wine article?

---

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"Nice attack and misdirection. No, I never said that I like to wear many names. Perhaps you do?

However, in response to this poke and that of Ohiotodd, who would shush my speculations by claiming to be more experienced than I, I will disclose that my combined posts on these boards under my former and current identity total 2,000. (After I reached Afficionado status, my niece used this computer while visiting to make some posts on the board, and for some reason I couldn't get my old name back after she changed the dang thing to a new login. Seems Bravo's program only accepts one name from an IP address. So, I have been CityGirl ever since, curse the moon.)

So when I say that this "blanket the world" scheme was executed by some very highly experienced person, I do know whereof I speak."


Wow, you are sticking by your theory I see. Okie dokie. What was your other name? Just curious, no need to tell if you dont want to.

---

FoodFanOne.

---

THANKS BRILLKE FOR COINING THAT QUESTION

HAVE A GOOD ONE BRILL



TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

BEEN FUN

BUT UNLIKE YOU 24/7NERS

I HAVE TO WORK TOMORROW

. . .WITH THAT CARRY ON

END OF LINE

---

I guess I'll take that as a "yes," you're the secret leaker.

---

WELL MISS CRONOLOGY

TAKE IT AS YOU LIKE

SORRY YOU'RE BUSTED

END OF LINE

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

GOOD LUCK ON THE NEXT INTERVIEW

KNOCK EM DEAD


thanks JMe. Be careful and catch ya later
GOTTA RUN SOME ERRANDS

NECESSITIES AND THE LIKE

SEE YA LATER

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

---

LOL

LOOK SIZ

YOU DID A ME LOL

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

GOOD LUCK ON THE NEXT INTERVIEW

KNOCK EM DEAD

GOTTA RUN SOME ERRANDS

NECESSITIES AND THE LIKE

SEE YA LATER

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

---

thanks JMe. Be careful and catch ya later

thats better...got stuck in the middle of your post...oops

---

NO BIGGIES SIZ

DID THAT A FEW TIMES LOL

AND THANKS

ALWAYS TRY TO BE

CAREFULL THAT IS

BUT THERE ARE TIMES WHEN CAUTION MUST BE THROWN TO THE WINDS



TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Now, what would be REALLY funny would be if Food & Wine mag "accidentally" published the "other" winner article, describing their interview with the winning Marcel. Openly disclose that it was all a ploy.

Boy, we'd really be in a tizzy, then!

---

Problem is, they've alreadty dissed Marcel in this article...would make the magazine and Adam Sachs look doubly hypocritical.


but, hey! As long as I can avoid seeing or hearing Betty again, I'm happy.

---

AMEN about Betty!! I can't even watch her on the old shows any more. Like nails on a chalk board!!! scccrrrrreeeeecccchhhhh

---

YOU SOOOOOOOOO MEAN SIZ LOL

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Alas, Kristl, the only famous person met here has been King Kink, aka JustMe!! lol Just to busy with my afficionado duties to go out and meet the stars...
No surprise about Damsel...I think she is pretty sneaky, getting published and all. You better keep an eye on her!!

---

Uhm Siz I'm insulted only Justme I'm famous in my own mind...lol

---

LET'S GET HER ACTOR

SHE'S ON THE COALS NOW

I'M NO WHERE NEAR FAMOUS

AND DEF NO KING

THE ONLY FAMOUS ONE I'VE MET IS YOU

SO I GUESS WE BETTER PUT IT TO HER

WHAT'S UP SIZ???????????

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

NOW LETS TALK PI




THE CHERRY

IF IT'S WARM

COCONUT CREME IF I CAN RUB IT IN

THE BANANA

WELL THE KNIFE SLICES A BIT TOO CLOSE TO TOUCH THAT

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

Coconut and cherry will suffice,
That banana better stay intact
Rub it in real nice

AI

---

O8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DANG AI

IF SIZ ACTOR MC WHERE HERE

ME THINKS IT WOULD BE

TOASTED BANANA

TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

PS DO YOU NOTICE SOME OF THE 24/7ERS AREN'T HERE

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"Nice attack and misdirection. No, I never said that I like to wear many names. Perhaps you do?

However, in response to this poke and that of Ohiotodd, who would shush my speculations by claiming to be more experienced than I, I will disclose that my combined posts on these boards under my former and current identity total 2,000. (After I reached Afficionado status, my niece used this computer while visiting to make some posts on the board, and for some reason I couldn't get my old name back after she changed the dang thing to a new login. Seems Bravo's program only accepts one name from an IP address. So, I have been CityGirl ever since, curse the moon.)

So when I say that this "blanket the world" scheme was executed by some very highly experienced person, I do know whereof I speak."


Wow, you are sticking by your theory I see. Okie dokie. What was your other name? Just curious, no need to tell if you dont want to.

---

FoodFanOne.

---

THANKS BRILLKE FOR COINING THAT QUESTION

HAVE A GOOD ONE BRILL



TAKE CARE OVER THERE

ALOHA

HAVE FUN

---

And that's supposed to mean what? You keep implying that I'm currently posing under two names. But, I have repeatedly said that I posted under one before, and now post under a different name. Is that really such a tough concept to grasp?

Frankly, I was just as glad to be screwed out of my old name, since there was always so much pressure to do poetry for everyone all the time, and I haven't been anxious to resume doing all the dittys. No doubt Brillke has known who I was all along, as witnessed by her diplomatic way of giving me an out should I choose not to say who I "was."

But, turning the spotlight back onto you: You, on the other hand, have never clarified whether you post under two different names currently. So, what is it Justme? Are you going to duck all my questions, or just give some straight answers?

Franky, it's all this ducking and weaving on your part that just makes it look more and more like you're the one.

Question: Are you the one who leaked the Food & Wine article. Answer only "yes" or "no." Any further lame-ass ducking a direct answer will be deemed a "yes."

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Let's talk about DianaRuggles again. She registered at 4:20 this afternoon and within minutes had posted the spoiler about Ilan on at least two top chef boards.

I know we've all concluded that the Food & Wine article was well-written enough to be "the real thing" and that some poor slob at Food & Wine probably will lose his job over the leak.

But, have we thoroughly exhausted the idea of a plant? Ms. Ruggles has now posted the entire text of the article here tonight. One has to ask why she persists. Is she just a glory-hogging noob, or is there a dedicated effort to make sure that a "plant" really sticks?

Let's discuss.

---

Could be a fake b/c she copied the text after it had been taken down. She could have posted the link to twop, but chose to post the whole text & then went on to stress the author's name & credentials. Why register just to post the spoiler? Probably jivey & co at work...

---

Hilary, you are quite the conspiracy therorist, aint ya? Let me introduce you to my friend WhatAJoke. Hes a funny guy who loves conspiracys too. You guys would make the cutest couple.


Lookit me playing match maker. Name the kids after me if there are any, k?


lol,

brillke

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Ilan - C'mon You Guys!
Sam - I'm Not That Guy Burgerhut
Elia - You'll Beee More Hurt Than Meee Eeeef You Don't Eeeet Heeeere
Marissa - Hockey Puck Heaven
Cliff - Full Nelson Funburgers
Mia - Cowboy Breakfasts, You [expletive deleted]
Josie - Palate Pleaser Plates
Betty - Frazzled Food
Frank - Beat You Up Burgers
Michael - Duuude, it's Food

---

Sam: Pickled Pink
Marcel: Monsieur Mousse
Ilan: The Saffron Sadist
Michael: Midge's Fridge
Cliff: The Cracked Rib
Elia: Chez Speet
MIa: Mother F*cker Bar & Grill
Frank: La Casa Nostra
Josie: L'Esbos
Marissa: Sweet Nothings
Carlos: Dos Hombres
Betty: closed

---

LOL! closed.!!! I can actually see Mia or Mike owning a 'Motherf*cker Bar and Grille' if they could get away with it.

Elia: Le Collapse. or maybe "The Rubber Room'

---

Elia could be "Le Chocolate Massage"

---