QUOTE (BooglieOoglie @ May 28, 2008 - 05:56 PM)

Hello Kiasmama,
I would like to welcome you to the has had stuff slung at them from Jack123 club. What Jack123 doesn't seem to understand trying to insult someone about something they have no reason to be ashamed of, only hurts the accuser.
I for one am thankful that you are doing this research. I was also appalled at the "sugar" tear that Jackie Warner is on. In another post on another workout board, which I will post below, I was wondering if things have changed since I was told this.
"I agree sugar is one major enemy and easy to abuse, but she totally left out empty carbs, which is the main problem. I hear her discussing how much sugar but never mentions the glycemic index of a food. A food with a high glycemic value will act just like pure sugar, and is just as dangerous for your body. If you tell someone to cut out sugar, they will substitute with high glycemic foods, exactly like a smoker cutting back to lower nicotine cigarettes will just inhale deeper and longer, getting the same nicotine from the cig, without even knowing it.
The best advice is quite simple, watch your carbs, all of them. Try not to get above 45-65 carbs per meal(harder than you might think), keep your fiber intake above 35 grams, and keep your water/liquid intake up.
White bread is high on the glycemic index where as whole wheat is lower. Here is a nice free website if you want to check on how quickly foods break down.
http://www.glycemicindex.com/Best advice, go have an honest talk to your doctor, who can hook you up with a dietitian/nutritionist who knows what they are talking about(everyone should see one, once, just like you want to know what octane gas for your car). What I said is a suggestion, but you need what works for you. You have one body, don't just trust sound bites from someone who is not an expert on a subject."
There is some good info there. That is part of the problem. Jackie says sugar as a broad thing. You can't look at it that way. You also have to figure in your metabolic rates (which a dietician can help you with) and refer to glycemic index as you've stated. It's not just a simple "sugar is the devil" thing.
My main area of research is natural rewards...which is very interesting. You can't say drugs are more addicting, or sugar is more addicting, becasue as you've inferred, everyone is different. Just because we are all human, doesn't mean our bodies work the same way.
So why is one person a sugar addict and one isn't? It does have to do with brain chemistry, but it's not simply not eating sugar and breaking the addiction. It's all about the payoff. If you get more of a payoff from doing exercise than eating a candy bar....you will do the exercise. If you get more of a payoff from doing cocaine than eating a candy bar...you'll do the coke.
But what is that payoff and how do we rank it mentally? That's the million dollar question. There are some very interesting things going on with brain plasticity (teaching and old dog new tricks). It has to do more with how you think about the candy bar, than the candy bar itself. Breaking any addicition, whether food, drugs, whatever takes a change in thinking and 8 times out of 10 that change can't be made without some outside cognitive therapy and support.
I'm getting too long winded...lmao!