SimonBao
March 18, 2008 - 07:40 AM
QUOTE (dogabone @ March 17, 2008 - 04:04 PM)

Another Hmmm.
I was perusing the chef bios and noticed the cavalier way Bravo tosses around the term self-taught. It's used to describe anyone who didn't go to an actual culinary school, including chefs who learned through apprenticeships. An apprenticeship is still formal training, and before there was a raft of culinary institutes, it was how professionals were trained.
Bravo even uses the term self-taught to describe second- and third-generation chefs who grew up in the family business, learning at their parents' and grandparents' knees, so to speak. I'm sorry, but that is still training.
To me, self-taught is someone like Lisa in TC1, who started as a home cook and expanded her abilities on her own to a point at which she could teach others.
Am I being too "vocabularily" anal here?
Dogabone, I don't know what alternative term to use, but probably you are not being VocAnal here. Self-taught does imply that a person has not had any training. If a person has had training or instruction, as with an apprenticeship, that person isn't "self-taught." There are self-taught painters, guitar players, gardeners and cooks. But it may be that none of the cheftestants are self-taught. For their "Culinary Education," maybe BRAVO should be using the phrase "On the job training" for those who did not attend culinary academies.
A degree from a culinary academy has yet to prove all that important. In last year's finale, Hung had a culinary degree, Casey and Dale were "self-taught." Though Hung won, one could argue that maybe it was the culinary academy that drained all the joy and spontaneity out of his cooking and left that intact for Casey and Dale.