QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

It was Tom who called Mark's dish sloppy. And how can you say it was telling that it wasn't shown having her comment on Stephanie's food? Maybe she didn't find it as objectionable as you (or Padma) did? In fact, she did call it out as a dish that showed that she didn't really know how to cook that type of food.And she was shown definitely agreeing with Tom on the peanut butter/tomato thing.
Tom calls Mark's sloppy. I guess that makes Stephanies super duper sloppy then.
Gail absolutely left it out. In her other blogs she mentions the other dishes and how they tasted. She goes into great detain as to how bad the stuffed mushroom was or How Marks chowder tasted. In this blog we get Nada. They can't ever possibly justify their decision if they mention how bad Stephanies food tasted so they just pretend it never happened.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

And maybe, just maybe, he's telling the truth. Since you think he's a liar, and this reinforces that, you'll never believe it though.
Why should we believe it when the guy can't even remember who the top three on the episode were?
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

Funny how production might favor a cute soundbite as opposed to 30 minutes of debating which dish was worse.
Tom Calls it "offputting" Padma calls it "disgusting" and says she "detested" it. I don't see how 30 minutes of them trying to figure out how to send Mark home and save Stephanie for a female top chef angle or simple past performance, will convince anyone that the right decision is made. It's more likely that well get 30 minutes that completely indictes the way the show is run.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

Yes, the conspiracy is deeply entwined. Even the grips are involved. Frankly, I'm surprised that she would say that, just as you were surprised that the guest judge would say that Stephanie's and Mark's dishes both tasted good (certainly not what he said on the show).
The grips could be waiting for 3 days to eat and not want a taste of Stephanie's disaster. I'm not surprised that Lee Anne said that Mark's food was probably fair/average.
Nor am I surprised that she was not allowed to say how bad Stephanies was. The Guest's comments on the show and the blog are completely at odds with themselves so I really don't know where his head is.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

But you don't know that for a fact. And maybe the fact that she did offer something tasty worked in her favor and balanced out the "badness" of the dish. Maybe if Mark had done that as well, he wouldn't be gone. And who knows how his side dish tasted. Sounded pretty underwhelming to me.
A. is irrelevant.
Uh and what do you know for a fact about this show? Lee Anne's blog spells it out: She made an apple dessert. Of course the kids will like that. Mark probably could have made a great curry and apple dessert would have carried the day with the kids so it's a not a relevant point of comparison.
Not to mention the fact that they said family of four and it turned out to be 4 kids was deliberately misleading and Mark says his recipie would have changed accordingly.
Uh how is deliberately misleading people irrelevant. Saying "it was the childrens least favorite" implys that all the children ate it which was not the case and makes it a very dubious way to support Mark's elimination.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

It's possible. It's possible that she didn't feel like she stood up for opinion enough. It's possible that she feels steamrolled by the other three judges. Or, she might just be toking on a big fattie.
Steamrolled by Tom is more like it. Especially considering he bragged about being head judge and getting his way on the Chow interview.
And it's good that you point out Padma's penchant for the herb. If a pothead with the munchies wont eat something it's pretty bad.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

Unproven allegation that is not a fact. Dismissed.
Proven fact! Here is the link!
Impossible to feed a family of four with $10 at Whole Food$ LMAO Readmitted as undeniable.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

It was a minimum effort that deserved to be dinged. It showed no balance, a wacky flavor profile, an offering of a super-sweet dish to children, looked grim, had no imagination, was ill-conceived for the challenge, and certainly didn't seem to maximize the $10 at all. And, normally when you add a green vegetable to add nutrition, you don't add something as empty as cucumbers (something that Gail pointed out).
Your minimum effort/maximizing $10 point is rendered invalid by the proven pantry shenanigans. Second episode in a row that rewards cheaters and penalized people who followed the "rules".
Cucumbers are about as empty as canned diced tomatoes right? Mark's dish probably provides more vitamins than Stephaine's now that I think about it.
QUOTE (teleburst @ May 7, 2008 - 11:07 AM)

Well, you're left with that, but you're always left with that.
And yet you still can't disprove it.