QUOTE (Bed & Breakfast @ May 4, 2008 - 11:54 PM)

Hey everyone!
I have been incredibly busy, and have only read the first 10 pages. I have noticed, however, that my name has been taken in vain, (so to speak), so I decided I better write something out now, before I catch up with my reading.
I have decided, however, to take a slightly different approach, so that we don't end up having this board become a B&B/WAJ, Point/Counterpoint, as it seem to have the last couple of weeks. Instead, I'm just going to write a post why this week's elimination fit exactly into my "All About the Food" theory, and a second post on why it totally disproves the "ratings/fixed" theory. Simply my opinions, stated frankly, without all the back and forth. So .... onward!
For this week not to be about the food, you have to accept the concept that "off-putting" equals "inedible". It sure doesn't to me, for a couple of reasons. First, in my lexicon, on a scale of 0 to 10, off-putting could be anywhere from a 2 to a 5. It is a subjective term, and relies on personal taste. I find even the slightest amount of dill to be off-putting, but my wife loves it. Conversely, she is very sensitive to cilantro, whereas I love it. Neither would render any dish inedible; we just wouldn't care for the flavor combinations.
Secondly, we have seen off-putting many times before, and to my recollection, it has never been grounds for elimination, at least not on it's own. The first example that comes to mind is Casey's mole at Latin Lunch. Virtually no one liked it, yet she was not eliminated. When queried, she responded that it had turned out the way she wanted it to, so it came down to a matter of personal taste, and cheftestants are rarely eliminated for matters that can be considered personal taste, unless it's something like too much salt (and then the cheftestant usually makes the mistake of admitting there was too much at JT, instead of standing behind the dish).
So, by the end of JT, we had a dish that the judges didn't like the flavor profile of (though some people might, especially children), Mark's lousy curry, (which I thought was a mistake when he started talking about it), and an under-seasoned dish. (Frankly, all things being equal, I thought "under-seasoned" had a better chance of going home than did "off-putting"
As one of the three dishes was not distinctly worse than the others, the judges (as I've always maintained they do when there is not a clear "worst" dish), went to the next level of criteria; execution of the concept. As this was supposed to be a "family friendly" dish that people could replicate easily at home, Mark's dish was clearly the loser among the three. While you do not have to serve meat at every meal, a truly "family friendly", healthy meal does have to have protein. Mark was evidently oblivious to that fact, or that he could have a vegetarian dish that could supply the daily requirement of protein by adding things like beans, nuts or soy products. The other two dishes, though flawed, did provide at least some semblance of vitamins and proteins. His did not, thus he was eliminated, and it was for the food he prepared.
So, far from being "my worst nightmare", once again the judging was about the food.
My next post will explain why I think this, if not a "nightmare" for WAJ's point of view, it was at least a bad dream.
Your name was taken in vein? Did people miss Mass too?
Seriously It's good to see you back and glad to hear things are busy.
Wait I thought it was the "worst food goes" theory? It's certainly not "all about the food" as I could gon on and on about with casting past eliminations etc...
Yes I agree "offputing" could be a something that simply inspires a subjective responce, such as your aversion to Dill. However in Stephanie's case the dish was poorly executed as even the cous cous was overcooked, the flavor combination seemed to be disgusting, it was visually nausiating and also Padma "Detested" it, backing up the point that it was nasty. So I'd say that when Tom says "offputting" he's being kind and using a bit of Damage control for someone who has excelled in the past.
Your example of Casey Mole' at latin Lunch is close but Lia's food was poorly cooked, didn't taste good and wasn't latin and she deserved to go.
And Clearly Tom was fishing for any reason to eliminate Mark when he played the protien card. I talked to a friend of mind who is a nutritionist and the the only thing she could find that why people would think it was "unhealthy" was the coconut milk simply for the sautrated fat but also noted that the type of saturated fat in coconut milk also offers health benifits and is the subject of medical research for it's benefits. Between the vegetables and the coconut milk there was enough protien for a healthy meal as part of a balaced deit, that is unless your looking for some reason to eliminate someone on a Reality TV show.
Couple the coconut milk with the Sweet Potato, Squash and other vegetables and your assertion that his meal did not provide a semblance of Protien is wrong and your notion that it lacked vitamins is even more wrong.
Again this was another contestant being scapegoated to save two others who had worse food for various reasons.