QUOTE (robbay828 @ June 5, 2008 - 11:42 AM)

Bravo is slowly killing this show. Between the inconsistent judging, the emphasis on characters with personality versus characters that can cook their ass off, and now no one is blogging the finale. If they are going through the trouble to set up up blogs by the judges, then the judges ought to get their [expletive deleted] in on time. Right now, I'd be really interested in hearing the play by play on how Lisa got through yet again. I'd love to contrast the perspectives of Gail and Tom and Padma with some behind the scenes info from Leigh Ann. But I can't, because the blogs aren't f***ing updated. There has been a continuous downhill slide since Season 1 and I'm not sure I can stomach another season of this.
I'm afraid you're right about the show being killed and the inconsistent judging. I actually (and am probably the only one who does) like Lisa. She's not my favorite, but I haven't really had a favorite since season 2, the next two seasons have been all drama & very little else. I see Lisa as a very defensive person - don't know why that is so, but her body language suggests she is always waiting to get crapped on and just pulls into herself, expecting the worst from others, so she stays in battle mode all the time. Which is a pity (and must be extremely tiring) as she can be a kick a** cook at times. She also seems very socially inept - rather a lot of complaining and always saying the wrong or not-quite-right thing, example after Antonia was eliminated I think she was actually trying to reach out to the others, but botched it completely and, of course, probably alienated Steph and Blais even more by criticising them for not expressing joy she was still there. If she had paid Antonia a well-deserved compliment, it might have been a much smoother moment. Hopefully the others were compassionate enough to let it ride.
As for the inconsistent judging - I really think it has been. In season 1 there were a lot of lectures on the difference between a cook and a chef, leadership qualities, etc., but they have all fallen by the wayside and all we hear now is "we don't care what you do in the kitchen, all we care about is the food." Well, if I had the talent to be a cheftestant I would absolutely care about in-kitchen behavior. It's been pretty apparent in every season that at least one of the chefs has been less than ethical in their behavior. If I were to be eliminated I would want it to be because I prepared my dish with no interference and still ended up at the bottom of othe pile, not because some sleaze messed with it behind my back.
I have also heard Chef Tom berate cheftestants for NOT pushing their viewpoints strongly enough - most recently this season when he asked team Earth why they let the member with immunity dictate the dish. But on the Fire team, it was Lisa's obstinance/stubborness/bitchiness (pick one, they all equally apply) that steered the team from deviled eggs (which she did compliment as a good concept, but just not as a complete enough dish to wow the judges) to the end result which got them the win (all three dishes, not just her bacon), including a very impressed Ming Tsai. So, if the judges are going to chastise one chef for rolling over and letting someone else make decisions they should not also chastise a pushy chef for strongly advocating for their own point of view. This is why I feel the judging is inconsistent.
Granted, Lisa has not wowed the panel anywhere near as often as Blais or Stephanie and is by far less popular than Tiffany or Marcel ever were, but I would dearly love to see a woman win (admittedly I'm gender biased and I happen to think Blais is one of the nicest guys to ever compete and richly deserves full praise) and would welcome her in the Top Chef spat as much as I would Stephanie.