QUOTE (Dallasdeckard @ June 12, 2008 - 10:10 AM)

I hardly think that Stephanie was the "best from the beginning". She established herself early on as firmly in the middle, and had her outings in the bottom. However, like the classy dame she is, she poured it on as the season went by and really amped it up in the home stretch. I don't think anyone would disagree that she is a total sweetheart, and you'd have to be a Grinch to not have some joy in her winning it all. However, "best from the beginning", uh... no.
I agree about Dale. Some people have said he is Lisa with talent, I disagree. Dale is very hard on himself, and also others, and he has some serious social skills deficiencies. Lisa, however, thinks her sh!t doesn't stink and everyone else's does and has NO social skills whatsoever. That toolbox is empty.
There are many reasons why people liked Dale and didn't like Lisa, for one he wrote checks with his mouth that his azz could cash, whereas Lisa just ran her head and offered lousy meals. Also, Dale has a personality, whereas Lisa is simply a lack of one. Also, you could see a tender side to Dale, times when you could see into a kind person there... his loyalty and love for Stephanie and his kindness to chefs he liked.
I missed him in the closing weeks, it would have been a much more fun show with him there. I think Dale shot himself in the foot, whereas Lisa just shot the audience. We cringed for what Dale did to himself, but groaned for what Lisa did to us, who had to watch her and her neckless sourpuss.
Kudos to Steph though, if Bravo simply had to have a female Top Chef... she was a good choice. Although, I wouldn't have minded seeing Antonia win either.
I agree and disagree. I did not think Stephanie was like Casey, Casey last year was forgetable, and appeared to be a first half casualty in waiting, and then somehow at the midpoint or thereabouts, she found her stride and ranged from dominant/outstanding to very good until she crashed and burned in the finale (a failure Richard would duplicate this year almost on all points in the finale).
Stephanie by week 2 or 3 clearly appeared to be a tier 1 chef: Stephanie, and Richard and Dale appeared to have the most talent through the first quarter of the show. Antonia's consistent mediocrity/above average performances would lift her to right below that tier, while Dale would start stumbling a bit as the season wore on.
I dont think Stephanie was mediocre early, I think she was clearly a big time contender from day one. Dale and Richard's obvious respect for her was evident quite early in the competition.
As for Dale (and admittedly, I was a big time supporter), the clear differences between him and Lisa were quite evident in two very specific ways. First off, as you said, he actually performed well, whenever he wasn't saddled with Lisa and Spike and/or Nikki. All other pairings produced generally good to great results from him, and his solo work was consistently good. Additionally Stephanie has already attested to being a friend of his, and you could clearly see in his work with Stephanie and Richard, that they were quite respectful of his talent, as he was of theirs. They could work together, and it wasn't pulling teeth. When did we EVER see that with Lisa? It was clear from early on that she struggled to work w/others, virtually any others, unless she could bully them or be in charge, that she couldn't handle criticism at all, and that she was not a team player. I don't think its a coincidence, that the only people who had issues with Dale in the kitchen, were also, amongst the worst performers this season regardless as to who they worked with (Nikki, Lisa, Spike).